Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit had three great posts that I'd like to share on my blog. I'll post my favorite bits and perhaps add something of my own.
1. Guilty Southern White Boys
The notion (originally suggested by one of Andrew Sullivan’s readers) is that southerners — always the target of jibes and discrimination — try to out-left the left in order to be accepted in the media crowd. Postrel and Kaus disagree, and call it the lingering influence of the civil rights era when — in the South — the left really was on the side of the angels.
I think it's a little bit of both, personally. I've known MANY Guilty Southern White people, not all of them boys. I think most of it has to do with what Instapundit reader Allison Alvarez points out:
I blame people’s misconceptions about the south on ‘Hee Haw’. Think about it; other than the southern lawyer dramas most shows about the south are still in love with that slow southern comfort, Gone With the Wind stereotype. Even ‘Designing Women’ was obsessed with southern charm. So, I can’t blame most people who live outside of the south for their cultural ignorance when all they see is Colonel Sanders and Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel.
Speaking as a snobby northerner (and I am a snob sometimes, I admit it), it's no mystery why lots of southerners want to get as far from that image as possible. For many southerners I've met, they either react against that image or embrace it, but I've always thought that the ones who react hard against it were trying so hard to get the approval of the "cool," liberal northerner as something other than a redneck. They don't want people like me to group them with those other southerners. Too bad; if you're South of Jersey you're a redneck, case closed! You wouldn't believe how many southerners make it a point to mention that they hate country music and NASCAR when they first meet me. That won't save you, hillbilly!
2. FUBU Government: By the Gentry Class, for the Gentry Class, of the Gentry Class.
LOOK WHO’S WINNING UNDER OBAMANOMICS: “As the nearby chart shows, by almost every measure, the middle class hasn’t benefited much at all over the past two years – the number of employed has fallen while wages, disposable income and home prices have pretty much flatlined. At the same time, Wall Street and big business have made out like bandits. The Dow is up 30 percent since Obama took office, and corporate profits have shot up 42 percent.”
3. What's Wrong with the New Elite
Forget cultural insularity or smugness. The main problem with the “new elite” is that they’re not an elite at all. That is, they aren’t particularly smart, or competent. They are credentialed, but those credentials aren’t so much markers for smartness or competence, or even basic education, as they are admission tickets to the Gentry Class, based on good standardized test scores. That’s fine — ETS was berry, berry good to me — but it doesn’t have much to do with ability to succeed, or lead, in the real world. Worse yet, it seems to have fostered a sense of entitlement.
B-I-N-G-fuckin'-O Glenn. The ETS was very good to me too, Glenn, I kicked ass on my SATS and AP tests too. And here's what an anonymous commenter emailed Glenn with, which is completely in sync with the way I feel.
Very long-time reader and first time emailer. Just my two cents on the elitists.
I am an elite anti-elitist Tea Partier and I made my first protest signs way back in March 2009. I’m a Yale [BA, Philosophy], Columbia [MA, International Affairs] former Wall Street trader and risk manager who is just about done getting another masters [in Library and Information Science] during a two-year “John Galt” sabbatical from work. I’ve met many, many Tea Partiers at this point and they are not anti-elitist in a general, superficial sense. Indeed, they most often admire those who have succeeded by dint of a good education or hard work or taking advantage of a bit of good luck. The subset of elitists that we are fed up with are the ones in the government, the media, and academia who think (erroneously) that they know better what we should be doing with our time every day and have the right to pick our pockets to fund it. Not only are we tired of being condescended to (and take my word for it, I could wipe the floor with most of them intellectually) but they’re obviously screwing everything up.
I won't deny (nor will I apologize) that I have lived a pretty privileged life, with the best education and a great upbringing. I have nothing against the people who have worked hard to get into great colleges, hell, I worked hard and went to a good school too. But what separates me from those who I rail against is that I don't have a sense of entitlement or the belief that I know what's best for everybody else. Trust me, if I had a sense of entitlement I wouldn't have enlisted in the Navy as an E-3, that's for sure.
Reader Jim Bennett also emailed in this:
I’ve been thinking about this, and I am starting to think that the problems with a meritocratic elite are essentially the same as those of a centrally planned economy. Every meritocratic system is ultimately dependent upon some set of metrics to judge merit. But just as no centrally planned economy can create metrics that adequately describe the needed outputs of industry, no one meritocratic system can create metrics that adequately describe all of the characteristics needed to be, collectively, the decsion-makers of a society. Inevitably, the young people start performing to the metrics rather than the desired characteristics themselves. The university system has now created a truly bizarre set of success metrics (e.g., pleasing a professor of critical theory) and it is little wonder that many kids graduate after an expensive education and have almost no capabilities that fit them for work in the real world. To the extent that we make a graduate degree a necessary qualification for any real work we are getting the intellectual equivalent of the slop that Soviet factories churned out toward the end.
Don't I know it. Part of the reason I left college to join the military was that I found it to be a waste of time, and I didn't want to play "the game" of the education system any more. I was performing to the metrics, but not actually learning anything worth a damn, i.e., had little capabilities that fit me for work in the real world. I am speaking more towards the areas of liberal arts, as hard sciences DO teach you to be capable in the real world. Hypothetically, I could have worked the same hypothetical job straight out of high school that I could've worked after my two years at college, and I'm not sure another two years would've changed much.
Let me leave this subject with another great quote by Sci-fi legend, Robert Heinlein:
Political tags — such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth — are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. The former are idealists acting from highest motives for the greatest good of the greatest number. The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and lacking in altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbors than the other sort.
I'm glad to be in the curmudgeon camp.