The Republicans are extremely vulnerable in November. They are saddled with an unpopular war which is not going particularly well, high gas prices, and a softening housing market. The combination has many people feeling that the country is heading in the wrong direction. For the Democrats to capitalize, they could have outflanked the Republicans on the right. By demanding a more aggressive response to Islamic terror, they would have recaptured many 9/11 Republicans (Neocons) and appealed to those on the right who have grown increasingly disaffected with what so often seems to be an overly diffident approach to the war on terror. Of course, the Democrats chose to fight the Republicans frosm the left, which makes any efforts now to attack from the right suspect. Whenever a Democrat suggest the Republicans have been soft on terror, by not putting enough money into port security for example, their attacks tend to ring hollow since they have spent so much time attacking the administration over NSA, SWIFT (terrorist financing), the Patriot Act, etc.
The attacks from the left depended on the premise being accepted that the threat of terrorism has been overblown by the Bush administration in order to frighten people into supporting their attacks on our civil liberties. Unfortunately for the Democrats, the Islamic fascists have not played along; the recently disrupted plot to blow up multiple American airplanes and cause a greater death toll than 9/11 has brought the threat of terror right back into the public eye at a particularly poor time for the Democratic election chances.
This leaves only the war as a target of opportunity for the Democrats and their strategy there is quite risky, for them and for the country.
Recent Comments